Before slicing up the apple, I found its volume via displacement to be 121 cubic centimeters. It was (about) 5 cm high, so I marked off 1 cm slices.
Then I cut the apple in half, measured the radius, and calculated the volume as if the apple were a single cylinder/disk with a height of 5 cm. Obviously this is going to be a gross overestimation of the volume, as the apple is clearly not a cylinder, but we can improve our estimate by slicing again.
With two cuts, you now have two different radii. Unfortunately, the disks have different heights, though this could be fixed if you instead opted for a slicing method in which you take each previous slice and cut it in half (resulting in exponentially more slices).
Conceptual drawing of an apple as approximated by cylindrical disks
In the end, the approximate volumes I got were as follows:
1 cut (2 disks) - 171.05972 cm3
2 cuts (3 disks) - 165.95463 cm3
3 cuts (4 disks) - 157.76031 cm3
4 cuts (5 disks) - 126.77023 cm3
The approximations nicely approach the true volume of 121 cm3. Unfortunately, it becomes quite difficult to cut thinner cylinders accurately (unless you happen to be a master fruit chopper ninja). You could instead opt to continue your apple slicing on the computer - simply take a picture and measure the slice radii virtually. This particular image shows slices every quarter centimeter.
The idea you're illustrating here is that as you use more and more disks, the approximation approaches the true volume. If you were to cut the apple into infinitely many (infinitesimally thin) slices and add them up, you'd get the exact volume, which is what integrals allow you to do.
Alternatively, you could take this apple slicing even further and plot some points along the edge of the apple, solve for the equation of the polynomial going through all of those points, and then do the actual integral. I however, am going to go eat these apple slices.
No comments:
Post a Comment